Comments on: Google diff, match and patch ported to C# http://anteru.net/2009/06/22/514/ Graphics, programming & software engineering Thu, 22 Mar 2012 06:25:01 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: Anteru http://anteru.net/2009/06/22/514/comment-page-1/#comment-9106 Anteru Fri, 17 Jul 2009 08:14:00 +0000 http://anteru.net/?p=514#comment-9106 <a href="#comment-8964" rel="nofollow">@Andy Robinson</a> Couldn't you use a Dictionary for that? Simply add <tt>null</tt> as the value, and just work on the keys. @Andy Robinson
Couldn’t you use a Dictionary for that? Simply add null as the value, and just work on the keys.

]]> By: Andy Robinson http://anteru.net/2009/06/22/514/comment-page-1/#comment-8964 Andy Robinson Mon, 13 Jul 2009 01:27:30 +0000 http://anteru.net/?p=514#comment-8964 <a href="#comment-8158" rel="nofollow">@Marc Brooks </a> I've implemented the LinqBridge and that's helped the Linq references but I'm still struggling with Hashset substitutes. Any suggestions? Thanks, Andy Robinson @Marc Brooks
I’ve implemented the LinqBridge and that’s helped the Linq references but I’m still struggling with Hashset substitutes. Any suggestions?

Thanks,
Andy Robinson

]]> By: Anteru http://anteru.net/2009/06/22/514/comment-page-1/#comment-8161 Anteru Wed, 24 Jun 2009 06:07:53 +0000 http://anteru.net/?p=514#comment-8161 <a href="#comment-8130" rel="nofollow">@@dermouk</a> I had no problems while porting, the tests are exactly the same as for Java, the only difference is that the URLencode result is lower-case instead of upper-case. @@dermouk
I had no problems while porting, the tests are exactly the same as for Java, the only difference is that the URLencode result is lower-case instead of upper-case.

]]> By: Anteru http://anteru.net/2009/06/22/514/comment-page-1/#comment-8160 Anteru Wed, 24 Jun 2009 06:07:06 +0000 http://anteru.net/?p=514#comment-8160 <a href="#comment-8158" rel="nofollow">@Marc Brooks</a> Cool, didn't know of that. I was wondering anyway why the extension methods from LINQ are not available separately, as they are mostly trivial implementations and it's plain stupid to drag in the 100+ MiB of .NET 3.5 just to use <tt>.First()</tt>. Definitely worth a try. @Marc Brooks
Cool, didn’t know of that. I was wondering anyway why the extension methods from LINQ are not available separately, as they are mostly trivial implementations and it’s plain stupid to drag in the 100+ MiB of .NET 3.5 just to use .First(). Definitely worth a try.

]]> By: Marc Brooks http://anteru.net/2009/06/22/514/comment-page-1/#comment-8158 Marc Brooks Wed, 24 Jun 2009 05:21:13 +0000 http://anteru.net/?p=514#comment-8158 If you use Joseph Albahari Linq Bridge, you don't need to change the code to run under .Net 2.0 http://www.albahari.com/nutshell/linqbridge.aspx If you use Joseph Albahari Linq Bridge, you don’t need to change the code to run under .Net 2.0 http://www.albahari.com/nutshell/linqbridge.aspx

]]> By: @dermouk http://anteru.net/2009/06/22/514/comment-page-1/#comment-8130 @dermouk Tue, 23 Jun 2009 15:18:29 +0000 http://anteru.net/?p=514#comment-8130 Nice! I had also ported it to C# but didn't submit it because I had some problems with unicode chars having in .NET length 6 instead of 4 (as I remember) causing one test to fail. I check out how did you do it. Fo my Version I just changed the test ;-) Nice! I had also ported it to C# but didn’t submit it because I had some problems with unicode chars having in .NET length 6 instead of 4 (as I remember) causing one test to fail.

I check out how did you do it. Fo my Version I just changed the test ;-)

]]>